creatures/CR_0003_crab_eating_macaque.md
CANON SUBORDINATION — this document is PROPOSAL-TIER: it serves canon and never outranks it.
The canon: the CVD · the T1 foundation docs · the T0 registries (registries/) · the spine
(docs/spine/CH_*.md) · the region pages (_source/02_Tier_2_Region_Pages/). Authority order:docs/DOC_MAP.md§ 0.
Canon served (scanned from this document's own citations — widen it by hand where it is thin):
T0_Creature_Roster
READ THAT CANON FIRST — open it and derive from it before you build anything from this document.
If this document disagrees with canon, CANON WINS and this document is the defect — fix the
document, never the canon. Nothing here is applied until it is ratified into canon.
STATUS: PROPOSAL-TIER design sheet, written to docs/proposals/bestiary/BESTIARY_ELEVATION_DOCTRINE.md.
It cites canon rows and writes none.
T0_Creature_Roster @ CR_0003, CR_0140 · flores_island.md L159 · bali.md L128-132,L354-360
THE ROW IS THE REGISTRY'S SINGLE DEX SPECIES ENTRY for *Macaca fascicularis*, and it carries from
Flores into Bali. The Angkor temple-precinct cohort of the same binomial is a SEPARATE declared row,
CR_0140, OBSERVE-only and combat_permission PROTECTED. Three cohorts, two rows, three different
permissions — a lane that reads the binomial rather than the id will get this wrong.
vertebrae, a long non-prehensile tail, four grasping limbs with opposable thumbs and hallux
130; the hand is the design's live joint — full opposition, independent digit flexion, and a
precision grip that is the whole mechanic
The Flores form carries no living-tradition claim. The BALI form does: temple-macaque cultural
significance at Uluwatu and Sangeh, and the protected sad-kahyangan handling [SRC_00157, bali.md
L354-360]. The Angkor form sits in a sacred precinct and is non-huntable. The design consequence is
that the same animal is a HAZARD in one place and a PROTECTED RESIDENT in another, and the difference
is the ground it stands on rather than anything about the animal.
ELEVATION BUDGET: ZERO SUPERNATURAL AXES, DECLARED. This is ordinary fauna with no folklore role, and
the doctrine's own scope rule says an animal that is never faced as a designed being rides the
ordinary asset path. Inflating it would be the mirror-image of the defect the doctrine exists to fix.
WHAT IT GETS INSTEAD IS A JOB, and the job is real design work:
is one of the first living things the player sees after the fall, and its indifference is the point
— the world was already here.
Ch-4 cliff-vertical agility course as a theft-and-distraction hazard. temperament_prior is BOLD
and this is what bold means.
keep distance, it holds ground, and individuals carry human debris — a scrap of cloth worked into
the fur, a bead, a bottle cap. That is the same reading the guardian carries in a different key:
proximity to people is written on the body, in objects rather than in anatomy.
ONE-LINE READ: a macaque holding ground it should not hold, wearing something that used to belong to
somebody.
EMISSION: none.
Nothing added. The carried debris is an attachment set with declared sockets in the fur and physical
properties, not painted texture — because the theft mechanic requires the taken thing to be a real
object that can be dropped, chased and recovered.
Not a fight. ALLY/THREAT LEGIBILITY instead, and the theft is the mechanic:
| tell shape | body origin | what it means |
|---|---|---|
| the approach line | it comes at an angle, never straight, and does not look at the player | it is choosing a target on the player's belt, not on the player |
| the freeze | it stops fully, weight forward, one hand lifted | the commit is one beat away — this is the window to move a hand to a pouch |
| the snatch | the grab is a precision grip and the exit is vertical | it is gone up, and the chase is a climb |
| the hold-and-watch | it sits with the taken thing, in reach, watching | the trade is open — this is the recovery route that is not a chase |
TAME: collect_verb is TAME_BREED and the row's note says TAME after a gift-exchange protocol. The
tame and the theft are the SAME mechanic read from two directions, which is a genuinely good piece of
design already sitting in the row: the animal that takes will also trade.
and the precinct, and the hazard is staged on the cliff course rather than inside protected ground.
At Angkor the separate row is PROTECTED and OBSERVE-only, and this sheet does not design it.
INVENTED BY THIS SHEET. The bold cliff troop, the snatching, the temple significance and the
protected handling are CITED.
into the shoulder fur, the sea behind.
combat_permission is EMPTY on CR_0003 while CR_0140 carries PROTECTED. Two cohorts of one binomialwith one blank and one explicit permission is a trap for any lane that filters by column.
entirely in a notes cell today.